In my code journeys and programming adventures I’ve encountered many strange foes, and even stranger allies. I’ve identified at least five different kinds of code warriors, some make for wonderful comrades in arms, while others seem to foil my every plan.
However they all have their place in the pantheon of software development. Without a healthy mix of these different programming styles you’ll probably find your projects either take too long to complete, are not stable enough or are too perfect for humans to look upon.
The Duct Tape Programmer
The code may not be pretty, but dammit, it works!
However they all have their place in the pantheon of software development. Without a healthy mix of these different programming styles you’ll probably find your projects either take too long to complete, are not stable enough or are too perfect for humans to look upon.
The Duct Tape Programmer
The code may not be pretty, but dammit, it works!
Duct Tape |
This guy is the foundation of your company. When something goes wrong he
will fix it fast and in a way that won’t break again. Of course he
doesn’t care about how it looks, ease of use, or any of those other
trivial concerns, but he will make it happen, without a bunch of talk or
time-wasting nonsense. The best way to use this person is to point at a
problem and walk away.
The OCD Perfectionist Programmer
You want to do what to my code?
This guy doesn’t care about your deadlines or budgets, those are insignificant when compared to the art form that is programming. When you do finally receive the finished product you will have no option but submit to the stunning glory and radiant beauty of perfectly formatted, no, perfectly beautiful code, that is so efficient that anything you would want to do to it would do nothing but defame a masterpiece. He is the only one qualified to work on his code.
The Anti-programming Programmer
I’m a programmer, dammit. I don’t write code.
I’m a programmer, dammit. I don’t write code.
His world has one simple truth; writing code is bad. If you have to
write something then you’re doing it wrong. Someone else has already
done the work so just use their code. He will tell you how much faster
this development practice is, even though he takes as long or longer
than the other programmers. But when you get the project it will only be
20 lines of actual code and will be very easy to read. It may not be
very fast, efficient, or forward-compatible, but it will be done with
the least effort required.
The guy who couldn’t care less about quality, that’s someone elses job.
He accomplishes the tasks that he’s asked to do, quickly. You may not
like his work, the other programmers hate it, but management and the
clients love it. As much pain as he will cause you in the future, he is
single-handedly keeping your deadlines so you can’t scoff at it (no
matter how much you want to).
The Theoretical Programmer
Well, that’s a possibility, but in practice this might be a better alternative.
This guy is more interested the options than what should be done. He will spend 80% of his time staring blankly at his computer thinking up ways to accomplish a task, 15% of his time complaining about unreasonable deadlines, 4% of his time refining the options, and 1% of his time writing code. When you receive the final work it will always be accompanied by the phrase “if I had more time I could have done this the right way”.
Well, that’s a possibility, but in practice this might be a better alternative.
This guy is more interested the options than what should be done. He will spend 80% of his time staring blankly at his computer thinking up ways to accomplish a task, 15% of his time complaining about unreasonable deadlines, 4% of his time refining the options, and 1% of his time writing code. When you receive the final work it will always be accompanied by the phrase “if I had more time I could have done this the right way”.
Where do you fit?
Personally, I’d have to classify myself as the perfectionist. So, which type of programmer are you? Or perhaps you know another programming archetype that is missing from my list? Post a comment below and I’ll add it to a new updated list.
0 comments